Best Rare Earth ETFs: REMX, REXC, EART and WDIG Compared

Rare earth ETFs give investors a basket of rare earth miners, processors and magnet suppliers in one trade. Four rare earth ETFs dominate the US market as of October 2026, and they differ more than their names suggest. The table below compares fees, size and what each fund actually holds.

US-listed rare earth ETFs compared (figures dated as shown)
Ticker Fund Expense ratio Net assets Launched Approach Holdings
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF 0.58% $1.48B (Oct 23, 2026) Oct 2010 Index: MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals 36
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF 0.65% $66.5M (Oct 23, 2026) Apr 2026 Index: Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China 41
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF 0.59% $45.9M (Aug 31, 2026) Jan 2022 (as DMAT) Index: Solactive Rare Earth and Critical Materials 50
WDIG WisdomTree Efficient Rare Earth Plus Strategic Metals Fund 0.55% About $3.7M (Oct 14, 2026) May 2026 Active: miners plus base and precious metal futures 20+ equities

Sources: issuer fund pages and fact sheets (VanEck, Sprott, Global X, WisdomTree). The WDIG asset figure comes from third-party listings. Figures change daily, so check the issuer page before you invest.

Rare Earth ETFs at a Glance

US-listed funds compared
4

Source: Issuer websites

Updated: Oct 2026

Lowest expense ratio
0.55% (WDIG)

Source: WisdomTree

Updated: Oct 2026

Largest fund by assets
REMX, $1.48B

Source: VanEck

Updated: Oct 23, 2026

How the Four Rare Earth ETFs Differ

REMX: VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

Largest and oldest. Large lithium weight; includes Chinese producers.

REXC: Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF

Most concentrated rare earth exposure; excludes China. MP and Lynas are about 40% combined.

EART: Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF

Renamed from Global X Disruptive Materials (DMAT) in March 2026.

WDIG: WisdomTree Efficient Rare Earth Plus Strategic Metals Fund

About half the portfolio is metal futures, none of them rare earths. Very small fund.

REMX is the benchmark rare earth ETF for liquidity and history, but it is a strategic metals fund as much as a rare earth fund. In October 2026 its largest positions were lithium producers SQM and Albemarle, ahead of China Northern Rare Earth, MP Materials and Lynas. REXC is the closest thing to a pure rare earth basket, and it excludes Chinese companies. That makes REXC a direct bet on non-China supply chains, with heavy concentration in MP Materials and Lynas.

How to Compare Rare Earth ETFs

Comparing rare earth ETFs comes down to five checks.

  1. Rare earth share of holdings. Read the holdings list, not the fund name. Lithium, uranium and base metal miners dilute rare earth exposure.
  2. China exposure. Funds that hold Chinese producers track China's market; ex-China funds track the Western supply chain build-out.
  3. Concentration. When two stocks are 40% of a fund, the ETF behaves much like those two stocks.
  4. Size and liquidity. Funds with very small assets can have wide bid-ask spreads and face closure risk.
  5. Expense ratio. Fees range from 0.55% to 0.65%. Fee differences matter less than the holdings differences above.

Which Rare Earth ETF Fits Which Investor

Matching rare earth ETFs to investor goals
If you want Consider Trade-off
The most liquid, established fund REMX Large lithium weight; includes China
Concentrated rare earth exposure outside China REXC Higher fee; small and young fund; two stocks dominate
Broader critical materials basket EART Small fund; rare earths are one theme among several
Miners combined with metal futures WDIG Very small; futures are not rare earths
Only a small rare earth tilt Broad mining funds Rare earth exposure is minimal

Rare Earth ETFs vs Individual Stocks

Rare earth ETFs spread single-company risk, which matters in a sector where one plant outage or one export rule can move a stock 30% in a day. Individual rare earth stocks offer more precise exposure, for example to separation capacity or magnet production, but each carries project and financing risk. Many investors hold a rare earth ETF as the core and add individual names from the rare earth stock watchlist.

Rare Earth ETF FAQ

What is the best rare earth ETF?

No single rare earth ETF is best for every investor. REMX is the largest and most liquid rare earth ETF, but a large part of it is lithium producers. REXC gives the most concentrated rare earth exposure and excludes China, at a higher 0.65% fee and with far fewer assets.

Is REMX a pure rare earth ETF?

No. REMX tracks rare earth and strategic metals companies, so lithium producers such as SQM and Albemarle are among its largest holdings. Rare earth producers like China Northern Rare Earth, MP Materials and Lynas make up a smaller share of the fund.

Do rare earth ETFs hold physical rare earth metals?

No. Rare earth ETFs hold shares of mining, processing and materials companies. WDIG also holds metal futures, but those are base and precious metals such as copper, nickel and silver, not rare earths. There is no liquid exchange-traded futures market for rare earth oxides.

Which rare earth ETF excludes China?

The Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC) excludes companies domiciled or primarily operating in China. REMX and EART can hold Chinese producers, which matters if you want exposure to non-China supply chains specifically.

Why are rare earth ETF expense ratios higher than broad index funds?

Rare earth ETF expense ratios run from 0.55% to 0.65% because the funds are small, specialized and hold many foreign-listed stocks. Broad materials funds such as XLB charge far less, but rare earth companies are only a tiny part of those portfolios.

This page compares funds for research purposes and is not investment advice. See the disclaimer.